The proposed figure of Rammandir where the Babri Masjid stood once before its demolition.
This video is about an interesting debate between a Hindu and a Muslim brother.
The Hindu brother expresses his pride in the victory in the election in India and says that they will build Rammandir or the temple of Rama in Ayodhya after this victory.
The Muslim brother: Will you build the temple of Rama according to the teachings of your religion or will you build it according to your own wish?
The Hindu brother: Surely, we will build it according to the teachings in our religion.
The Muslim brother: Yajur Veda, Chapter 32, Verse 3 says: God does not have any shape or figure. This is in your scripture, if God does not have any picture or idol, then how will you make the idol of Rama in the temple?
In addition, the Upanishad says that God does not have any mother or father, no children or any wife. He is Alone, and He is One. How will you build a temple having the statue of God rather statues for the whole family of God? Please, answer my question. Then, the Hindu brother became silent.
Every true religion of the world has the same message of monotheism that has been summarized in the Glorious Qur’an in Surat Al-Ikhlas.
“Say (O Muhammad!): “He is Allah, the One, Allah is the Self-Sufficient, Master, Whom all creatures need, He begets not, nor was He begotten, and there is none co-equal or comparable unto Him.” (Al-Ikhlas 112:1-4)
If this is the true message, then, please, do not shed blood in the name of religion.
Loading...
SAMIR SARDANA
Subject – How can a Mosque be renounced by virtue of perceptual faith to Idolators &a Heathen God
Context
This is proof that Hindoosthan has to be partitioned.dindooohindoo
The Indian Judiciary,in another case, has hanged a community based on public perception. In other words,it has deprived a Title owner of its Title – on the grounds of perceptual faith,and denied the title holder the right to make a renunciation.
History ?
It is “neither History nor an Interpretation or Perception of History”.It is a Distortion of History.What is Public perception in a nation where idols drink milk & rum &500 million people are swayed by a Rs 15,00,00 promise.During the time of Babar,the population of Hindoosthan might have been 15 million &that of Ayodhya,around 350000.
How can the “Muslims” of Hindooosthan – give a Mosque to the Hindoo Idolator ?
ASI
ASI Reports mean nothing as the temple underneath, may have a stupa underneath (as it was a controlled excavation) – &there was no monolithic Hindoo faith in that time – just menial,savage,heathen pagan &satan worshippers.The ASI report has no proof that there was a Rama temple or that it was the birthplace of Rama or that it was a temple of Vishnu.
ASI has done limited excavations in Ayodhya &I can bet that if it is done – there will be several Ram Janamsthans – set up by Brahmins to milk hapless &heathen Hindoos – just like the Bible of Barnabus (appeared magically) &blew up the Jesus crucifixion &resurrection gospel.
The 5 acre pitt(y)ance
Will the Hindoos allow the Muslims to make a “Shaheed Babri Masjid” at the 5 acre spot ? Babar &the Mughals civilised the Hindoos ! Read this verse from the Ramayana – when Ravana describes Seeta !
http://www.valmikiramayan.net/aranya/sarga46/aranya_46_frame.htm
“Your hips are beamy, thighs burly akin to elephant’s trunks, &these two breasts of yours that are ornamented with best jewellery are rotund, rubbing &bumping each other, &they are swinging up &up, their nipples are brawny &jutting out, &they are smoothish like palm-fruits, thus they are covetable for they are beautiful.
“Oh, allurer, your smile is alluring, teeth are alluring, &your eyes allure, oh, beauty, your waist is palmful, your hair velvety, your breasts are jostling, &you rob my soul as a spate robs riverbank. [3-46-21, 22a]
It will be obvious to the AG of the Indian Government, that Seeta was topless &wearing a loincloth. THE MUGHALS TAUGHT THE HINDOOS TO WEAR CLOTHES &DO PROPER ABLUTIONS !
Besides the above,how can a “Muslim” &even an “Indian Muslim” renounce a mosque to Rama ? Who is Mr Tulsidas ? Was the Quran revealed to the Prophet or to Ghazali ? Tulsidas was a hallucinated crank high on coke – in love with Rama who spent 12 years in a jungle with only apes &some humans
As per the Valmiki Ramayana – Sita called Rama an impotent pansy &Rama is quoted in the Ramayana – as stating to Seeta – that she should prostitute herself to apes,demons &Rama’s own brother ! Can such a man be a Prophet or a God or Imam ?
Seeta calls Rama an Impotent Pansy
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya Chapter[30
“What my father, the king of Mithila belonging to the country of Videha, think of himself having got as so-in-law you, a woman having the form of a man?”
Rama tells Seeta to prostitute herself
Chapter [115
“O Seetha! That is why, I am permitting you now. Go wherever you like. All these ten directions are open to you, my dear lady! There is no work to be done to me, by you.”
“O gracious lady! Therefore, this has been spoken by me today, with a resolved mind. Set you mind on Lakshmana or Bharata, as per your ease.”
“O Seetha! Otherwise, set your mind either on Shatrughna or on Sugreeva or on Vibhishana the demon; or according to your own comfort.”
Can a Mosque be renounced in favour of such a person ?
Partition = only solution the Rama Temple will never be completed
SAMIR SARDANA
Y a temple for Rama
How can a Hindu even consider Rama as a God or a Prophet or a Messenger or a Seer
Sita called Rama an Impotent Pansy
https://dindooohindoo.page.tl/Sita-says-Rama-is-Impotent-Pansy.htm
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya Chapter[Sarga] 30
किम् त्वा अमन्यत वैदेहः पिता मे मिथिला अधिपः | राम जामातरम् प्राप्य स्त्रियम् पुरुष विग्रहम् || २-३०-३
“What my father, the king of Mithila belonging to the country of Videha, think of himself having got as so-in-law you, a woman having the form of a man?”
अनृतम् बल लोको अयम् अज्ञानात् यद्द् हि वक्ष्यति | तेजो न अस्ति परम् रामे तपति इव दिवा करे || २-३०-४
SAMIR SARDANA
Like I said in my post ABOVE “samir sardana says: December 26, 2019”
“Partition = only solution the Rama Temple will never be completed”
RAMA TEMPLE WILL NEVER BE COMPLETED !
CHAIWALA AND BANIA COMPANY HAD PLANNED TO BUILD IT BY JUNE 1ST !
INDIA WILL BE DESTROYED ! dindooohindoo
THE END HAS COMMENCED !
COMPLETE ERADICATION !
ALLAH LOVES ME !
SAMIR SARDANA
Y WAS RAMA A LIMPET LIMPDICK COWARD WEASEL
CASE 1 – HE WAS BORN BY HIS LIMPDICK FATHER WHEN DASHRATH WAS 6000 YEARS OLD
Book I : Bala Kanda – The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 20
षष्टिर्वर्षसहस्राणि जातस्य मम कौशिक || १-२०-१०
कृच्छ्रेणोत्पादितश्चायं न रामं नेतुमर्हसि |
10b, 11a. koushika = oh Vishvamitra; jaatasya mama = birthed, for me [from my birth]; SaSTiH varSasahasraaNi = sixty thousand years [passed] ; ayam = this one [Rama]; kR^icChreNa = with tribulations; utpaaditaH cha = is produced given birth, also; raamam netum na arhasi = unapt of you to take Rama with you.
“Sixty thousand years have passed from my birth, oh! Vishvamitra, and this Rama is engendered at this age, that too with tribulations, hence taking Rama with you will be inappropriate of you. [1-20-10b, 11a]
CASE 2 – RAMAS MOMMY WAS NOT “IMPERGNATED BY DASHRATH” ! WHOSE SON WAS RAMA THE LIMPDICK
Book I : Bala Kanda – The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 16
ततस्तु ताः प्राश्य तदुत्तमस्त्रियो
महीपतेरुत्तमपायसं पृथक् |
हुताशनादित्यसमानतेजसोऽ-
चिरेण गर्भान् प्रतिपेदिरे तदा || १-१६-३१
31. mahiipateH tataH uttamastriyaH = those best ladies of king; tat uttamapaayasam = that, best dessert; praashya = on consuming; hutaashanaadityasamaanatejasaH = equalling Fire and Sun in resplendence [queens]; achireNa tadaa garbhaan pratipedire = then very soon they got – conceived.
Then on consuming dessert those best ladies of the king whose resplendence then vied with that Fire and Sun became pregnant after some time. [1-16-31]
samir sardana
PROOF THAT SEETA WAS A NEPALI RANDI
CASE 1 – RAVANA TALKING TO SEETA
Book III : Aranya Kanda – The Forest Trek
Chapter [Sarga] 49
राज्यात् च्युतम् असिद्ध अर्थम् रामम् परिमित आयुषम् || ३-४९-१३
कैः गुणैः अनुरक्ता असि मूढे पण्डित मानिनि |
यः स्त्रिया वचनात् राज्यम् विहाय ससुहृत् जनम् || ३-४९-१४
अस्मिन् व्याल अनुचरिते वने वसति दुर्मतिः |
13b, 14, 15a. muuDhe = oh, unintelligent lady; paNDita maanini = highly intelligent, deem your self; dur matiH = bad, minded [mindless Rama]; yaH striyaa vacanaat = who, by a woman’s, word; sa = along with; su hR^it janam = good, hearted, people; raajyam vihaaya = kingdom, on leaving off; vyaala anucarite = predators, moving in [on prowl]; asmin vane vasati = in this, in forest, he who lives – Rama; such a; raajyaat cyutam = from kingdom, fallen [spurned off]; a siddha artham = not, gainful, his purposes; [maanuSaH = being human]; parimita aayuSam = he is with – limited, longevity – short-lived human being; raamam = at Rama; kaiH guNaiH anuraktaa asi = by what, merits [of Rama,] impassioned [for him,] you are.
“Oh, halfwitted lady, you who deem yourself a highly intellectual lady, listen, that mindless Rama who just by a word of a woman forebode kingdom along with all of his amiable people, and lives in this forest where the predators are on the prowl, thus he who is spurned off from kingdom, ungainful are his purposes, and who is even a short-lived human, I wonder by what merits you are impassioned for such a Rama?” Thus Ravana spoke to Seetha. [3-49-13b, 14, 15a]
CASE2 – SEETA THINKS HER BODY IS TO BLAME FOR HER FATE.dindooohindoo
Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 48
स्तनौ च अविरलौ पीनौ मम इमौ मग्न चूचुकौ |
मग्ना च उत्सन्गिनी नाभिह् पार्श्व उरस्कम् च मे चितम् || ६-४८-११
11. maamakau = my; stanau = breasts; aviralau = are close to each other; piinau = fully developed; magna chuuchukau = and have depressed nipples; naabhiH = my navel; magnaa = is deeply; utsedhinii = indented; me = my; paarshvoraskamcha = flanks and bossom; chitam = are well-formed.
“My breasts are close to each other, fully developed and have depressed nipples. My navel is deeply idented. My flanks and bossom are well-formed.”